The State is the country's largest contracting party — and also its most demanding. After years advising construction companies and suppliers, the most important lesson I can pass on is simple: in public procurement, form is substance.
A document filed after the deadline, an improperly issued guarantee, or an observation left unanswered in time can disqualify the best technical proposal in the process. And after the award, performance of the administrative contract follows rules of its own that do not admit the informality tolerated between private parties.
Before bidding: a comprehensive review of the DBC
The Documento Base de Contratación (DBC, the government's standard bidding document) is not a form: it is the genesis of the future contract. Reviewing it with legal judgment before deciding to bid makes it possible to detect risks and ambiguous conditions — disproportionate penalties, unworkable deadlines, uncertain payment terms, grounds for termination — and to decide, with full information, whether it is worth participating and at what price.
Many companies do the technical analysis and leave the legal analysis for after they win, when it should be carried out before the decision to enter a bidding process.
During performance: contract administration
Once the contract is signed, contract administration becomes vitally important: the technical, legal, and financial follow-up that accompanies performance from the order to proceed through final acceptance. That is where it is decided whether everything won in the bidding process holds up or is lost along the way.
Extensions of time, change orders, force majeure events, the application of penalties, or an eventual termination of the contract: none of this is resolved verbally. Each of these acts needs to be backed by documents, with the formality the rules require — documents that later sustain a claim, an appeal, or a lawsuit.
That is why I insist to my clients that contract administration cannot be left solely in the hands of the site engineer or the technical lead. It must involve, in coordinated fashion, the inspector or supervisor appointed by the entity, the relevant legal and administrative unit, and — on the contractor's side — the same technical-legal-financial team that worked on the DBC before bidding. When that triangulation works from day one, informality has nowhere to get in.
Dispute resolution
Contracting with the State means accepting, from the outset, that the path for bringing claims is different from the one that exists between private parties. Knowing it in advance — and not once the problem has already arisen — is what makes it possible to react in time.
During the bidding process, the tool is the Recurso Administrativo de Impugnación (administrative challenge) provided for in the NB-SABS (Bolivia's basic rules on public-sector procurement): in processes above Bs 200,000, it allows a bidder to challenge, before the contracting entity itself, resolutions such as the award or the declaration of a failed process when they injure a legitimate interest. It is a remedy with short, non-extendable deadlines, so the decision to challenge — and the technical and legal support to do so — has to be ready before the clock starts running, not when it is about to run out.
During the performance of works, I see growing interest in dispute boards: panels of experts that accompany the project from its start and resolve technical disagreements almost in real time, before they escalate. In Bolivia they are not yet a mechanism that procurement rules impose by default.
And here is the warning that most surprises my clients: as a general rule, a legal dispute under an administrative contract is not resolved through arbitration, save for a few exceptions. So if the entity fails to pay a progress certificate or breaches its obligations, or if, on your side, the contract is terminated without grounds, the legal path is the contentious and contentious-administrative jurisdiction. Knowing this from the start avoids losing valuable time claiming before a forum that has no jurisdiction to decide the merits.
About the author
